Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58202 (AP)

Dr.Y.R.K.V.Tirupati Rao,. v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/10265/2025 · 2025-10-26

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010199272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 10265/2025 Between: 1. DR.Y.R.K.V.TIRUPATI RAO,., S/O.Y.RAMINAIDU, AGE- 62 YEARS, OCC- ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ON CONTRACT BASIS, DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY 86 MICROBIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SCIENCES ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, R/O.AGRAHARAM STREET, BOBBILI, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.A.P. 2. DR.P.V.NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O.MALLAIAH, AGE- 63 YEARS, OCC- ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ON CONTRACT BASIS. DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SCIENCES, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, R/O.54-6-1781, 8TH LINE, EMPLOYEES COLONY, KAKANI ROAD, KOTHAPETA POST, GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. DR.P.VENKAT RAO,, S/O.CHANDRANNA, AGE- 62 YEARS, OCC- ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ON CONTRACT BASIS. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK, ANU PG CENTER, ONGOLE, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY PRESENTLY WORKING ON DEPUTATION IN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WORK, ANDHRA KESARI UNIVERSITY AT ONGOLE, R/O.D.NO.8-5-54, SETTIBALIJA STREET, NEAR RAMA DURGA THEATER, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI. A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRAPRADESH. PRLSECY HE@AP.GOV.IN 2. ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR NAGARJUNA NAGAR-522510, GUNTUR DISTRIET, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY , NAGARJUNA NAGAR-522510, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings No.ANU/Estt- TS/Contract Faculty/Relieved/2025 dt.07.04.2025 relieving the Petitioners from the services upon reaching the Superannuation of 60 years, in violation of the Revised Guidelines dated 28.01.2019 issued by the UGC vide Proceedings No.F.25-1/2018 (PS/MISC) and in violation of the directions dt.26.11.2024 passed by this Honble Court in W.A.No.521 of 2024 8r, batch, and to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to set-a-side the same by consequently directing the Respondents to continue the services of the Petitioner with all attendant benefits, arears, and salary as per the Revised Guidelines dated 28.01.2019 issued by the UGC vide Proceedings No.F.25-1/2018 (PS/MISC) and in compliance of the directions dt.26.11.2024 passed by this Honble Court in W.A.No.521 of 2024 86 batch and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the services of the Petitioners by paying 3 salaries and other benefits; pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Suspend the proceedings No.ANU/Estt-TS/Contract Faculty / Relieved/ 2025; dt. 07-04-2025 issued by the 2nd Respondent; pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DEVALARAJU ANIL KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2. M.CHALAPATHI SC For Nagarjuna University The Court made the following: 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.10265 of 2025 ORDER : This writ petition is filed declaring the action of 3rd Respondent in issuing the impugned superannuation notice dated 07.04.2025 to the Petitioners on attaining the age of 60 years as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Pursuant to the interim order dated 26.09.2025 passed by this Court, the Respondents had passed orders dated 24.10.2025 and 25.10.2025 rejecting the case of the Petitioners for extension of their service in the Respondent-University. 3. In view of the same, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to file a fresh writ petition to challenge the order dated 24.10.2025. 4. Noting the said submission, writ petition is closed permitting the Petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 27.10.2025 KLP