APHC010551902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29125/2025 Between: 1. MUTHOJU SRIDEVI,, W/O MUTHOJU SRINIVASA CHARI, AGED 50 YRS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O 6-29, G.VEERAPURAM, KOTHAPALLY MANDAL, NANDIKOTKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STETE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTER, A.P. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ATMAKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAPALLY POLICE STATION, NANDYAL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in not registering the FIR against B.Venkata Lingareddy, B.Omkar Reddy, B.Ramana Reddy, Bhoomi Reddy, Ramakrishna Reddy, A.Naganun Reddy, C.Ramulamma, Sridevi and others, on the complaint given by the Petitioner for committing attempt murder against her Husband Sri.Sreenivasachari, for the offence under 109 of BNS, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Sections 154 8i 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code and also against the HoniDle Supreme Court Judgment in Lalith Kumari Vs. Government of UP and also violation of guidelines issued by the Central Government vide Circular No.l5011/91/2013-SC/ST-W, dated 12/10/2015, and consequently, 2 direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to register the First Information Report on the basis of the Complaint given by the Petitioner on 08/10/2025and conduct the enquiry as per the law and protect Petitioner's life and liberty. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUBRAMANYAM DARABOINA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in not registering the FIR against B.Venkata Lingareddy, B.Omkar Reddy, B.Ramana Reddy, Bhoomi Reddy, Ramakrishna Reddy, A.Naganun Reddy, C.Ramulamma, Sridevi and others, on the complaint given by the Petitioner for committing attempt murder against her Husband Sri.Sreenivasachari, for the offence under 109 of BNS, which is illegal, arbitrary and also violation of Sections 154 8i 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code and also against the HoniDle Supreme Court Judgment in Lalith Kumari Vs. Government of UP and also violation of guidelines issued by the Central Government vide Circular No.l5011/91/2013-SC/ST-W, dated 12/10/2015, and consequently, direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 to register the First Information Report on the basis of the Complaint given by the Petitioner on 08/10/2025and conduct the enquiry as per the law and protect Petitioner's life and liberty” 2. Sri Md. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint given by the petitioner, police have registered a case in Crime No.44 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 109()1), 118(1), 351(2), 126(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:24.10.2025 ARB 4 58 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29125 of 2025 Dt.24.10.2025 ARB