1 APHC010282162018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2404/2018 Between: 1. JASTI POORNA RAO, S/O LATE VEERA NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.12-97, PENAKALURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. JASTI RAMBABUU DIED, KHAMMAM 2. DUGGINENI LAKSHMI DURGAMBA, W/O RAMANADHA RAO , AGED RESIDENT OF ILLURU VILLAGE, MADHIRA MANCLAL KHAMMAM DISTRICT 3. CHAPARLA SRIDEVI, W/O CHAOPARLA SRINIVASA RAO AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D.NO. 40-25-32/1, MASJID STREET PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the order in I.A.No.926 of 2017 in O.S.No.37 of 2015 Dt.22-02- 201.8 on the file of the court of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Nandigama, Krishna District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 2 To stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.37 of 2015 on the file of the Court of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District pending disposal of the above CRP and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive any further, in view of the fact that O.S. No. 37 of 2015, on the file of the XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nandigama, was decreed as prayed for on 04.09.2025, and as such, the Civil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Recording the same, no further orders are required in this Civil Revision Petition. 4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 28.10.2025 PNS