APHC010344312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20942 OF 2021 Between: 1. Smt.G. Manjula, w/o G. Nagendra, Aged 33 years, Utkur village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its Principal. Secretary, Revenue Department,Secretariat, Vel 2. The District Collector, Anantapur. Anantapur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. The State S H O Parigi Police Station, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. Petition under Article 226 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue any writ order or orders directions, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus de respondents 3 and 4 without giving any notice or opportunity to the petitioner and without following due process of directed the petitioner to evict the petition schedule house situated in survey No. 96 Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 20942 OF 2021 1. Smt.G. Manjula, w/o G. Nagendra, Aged 33 years, Utkur village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its Principal. Secretary, Revenue Department,Secretariat, Velagapudi Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Anantapur. Anantapur District. 3. The Tahsildar, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. The State S H O Parigi Police Station, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be may be pleased to issue any writ order or orders directions, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents 3 and 4 without giving any notice or opportunity to the petitioner and without following due process of directed the petitioner to evict the petition schedule house situated in survey No. 96- 5A at Utukur Village, Parigi M Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Smt.G. Manjula, w/o G. Nagendra, Aged 33 years, Utkur village, Parigi ...Petitioner 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep, by its Principal. Secretary, Revenue 4. The State S H O Parigi Police Station, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District. ...Respondents of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be may be pleased to issue any writ order or orders directions, more claring action of the respondents 3 and 4 without giving any notice or opportunity to the petitioner and without following due process of directed the petitioner to evict the petition 5A at Utukur Village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice as well as against constitutional Law, consequently directing the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in the petition schedule property without following due process of law of the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to cause any sort of interference or obstruction in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property situated in survey No. 96- 5A at Utukur Village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to impleadment the proposed Respondents as Respondent Nos. 5 in W.P. No. 20942 of 2021 enabling them to file necessary petitions and affidavits,etc, and to contest the case, in the interest of justice and fair play and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20942 OF 2021 ORDER: The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “….may be pleased to issue any writ order or orders directions, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents 3 and 4 without giving any notice or opportunity to the petitioner and without following due process of directed the petitioner to evict the petition schedule house situated in survey No. 96- 5A at Utukur Village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice as well as against constitutional Law, consequently directing the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in the petition schedule property without following due process of law of the petitioner and pass such…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue brought to the notice of this Court that the subject land is Government land. It is further submitted one Smt. Nagaratnamma, W/o G. Narasimhappa, and Sri Nagendrappa, S/o G. Narasimhappa, residents of Utakuru Village, Parigi Mandal, filed O.S. No.81 of 2010 before the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Hindupur, against Shankarappa, S/o G. Kariyappa, and others of the same village. Upon consideration of both oral and documentary evidence, the Court held that the plaintiffs were not in possession of the disputed property shown within the HAJI points in the plaint plan, as the said property is Government land. Consequently, the suit was dismissed without costs. It is also submitted that the Village Secretary, Mandal Revenue Inspector, Mandal Surveyor, and Village Revenue Officer inspected the disputed road area and directed the petitioner to vacate the illegally occupied portion of the road to avoid inconvenience to the public. It is further contended that the petitioner produced manipulated documents to mislead the Court and prays to dismiss the writ petition. 4. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that they have nothing to do with the subject property, as the matter is civil in nature. 5. Considering the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the respondent authorities are directed to follow due process of law while evicting the petitioners from the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 27.10.2025 KKV 324 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20942 OF 2021 Dated 27.10.2025 KKV