Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58181 (PNJ)

LAXMI DEVI v. DEVINDER AGGARWAL AND ORS.

FAO/3990/2008 · 2025-05-01

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 204 Laxmi Devi Devinder Aggarwal and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) July 2008 Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, vide Award dated 16.10.2007 passed by the learned learned counsel for the appellant, which has been received back with the report “ prosecution liberty is granted to the FAO-3990-2008 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.3990-2008 Date of decision : Laxmi Devi Versus Devinder Aggarwal and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for the respondent Insurance Company. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has been filed by the claimants July 2008 against the dismissal of their claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, vide Award dated 16.10.2007 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon The office report indicates that the notice was issued to learned counsel for the appellant, which has been received back with the report “unserved as he has died”. The appeal is accordingly prosecution. However, it is made clear that in case anything survives, liberty is granted to the appellant to revive the same by filing 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2008 (O & M) Date of decision :-01.05.2025 …..Appellant …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for the respondent- The present appeal has been filed by the claimants in against the dismissal of their claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, vide Award dated 16.10.2007 tor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon. he office report indicates that the notice was issued to learned counsel for the appellant, which has been received back with is accordingly dismissed for non- . However, it is made clear that in case anything survives, to revive the same by filing VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.02 17.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appropriate proceedings as per law within so advised. May 01, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No FAO-3990-2008 (O & M) appropriate proceedings as per law within so advised. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 appropriate proceedings as per law within six months from today, if ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.02 17.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document