Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5818 (UTT)

JAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/895/2020 · 2025-06-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.895 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Rishabh Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel submitted that after investigation a charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 10.08.2020, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the State, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.06.2025 SK