1 2025:CGHC:52934-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1300 of 2022 1. Amar Das Kurre S/o Hemant Das Kurre, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Lalbandh, Police Station Nawagarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2. Ram Kunwar Kurre, W/o Hemant Das Kurre, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Lalbandh, Police Station Nawagarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3. Ishwari Bai Kurre, W/o Agar Das Kurre, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Lalbandh, Police Station Nawagarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Mahila Woman Police Station Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Maheshwari Kurre, W/o Shri Amar Das Kurre, Aged About 40 Years R/o Premnagar Mova, Police Satation Pandri (Mova) Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.31 10:44:34 +0530 2 Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 30.10.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “ I. allow the instant petition, II. quash the FIR 28/2021 registered at Woman Police Station, Raipur and consequently the entire proceedings in Criminal case No. No.4425/2021 pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (C.G.) III. discharge the petitioners from the offence punishable under Section 498A,34 and 406 of IPC in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the charges have been framed against the petitioner by the trial Court concerned and the evidence of two prosecution witnesses have already been recorded, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 3 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti