1 2025:CGHC:53257 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12450 of 2025 Babita Kashyap W/o Gyanendra Kashyap Aged About 52 Years Presently Posted As Peon At Office Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, (Member Committee Of Senior Secretaries) School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh The Upper Chief Secretary, (President Committee Of Senior Secretaries) Home And Jail Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary In Charge (Member Committee Of Senior Secretaries), Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Joint Director And Secretary Of The Division Level Rationalization Committee School Education Department, Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - The Joint Director Education Division, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.03 10:50:36 +0530 2 31.10.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition assailing the order dated 19.09.2025 passed by respondents No. 1 to 3 by which representation preferred by her assailing the order dated 28.06.2025 passed by respondent No. 6 whereby she has been transferred from Office of Joint Director, Education Division, Bilaspur to Government Higher Secondary School, Bhadi, Block Bilha, has been rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has some personal difficulty and would submit that the petitioner has already submitted representation before the respondent authorities raising her grievance. He would further submit that petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue representation before the concerned authorities. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika