APHC010208462021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12006 OF 2021 Between: 1. R V SATYANARAYANA, S/o. Bangarayya, Hindu, aged about 62 years, Cultivation, R/o. Rachapalli Village, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Pri Revenue Department, Velagapudi Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Makavarapalem Police Station, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 4. M/s Anrak Aluminium Limited, Rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Office at APIIC Industrial Park, G Koduru Village, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering .he complaint IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 12006 OF 2021 1. R V SATYANARAYANA, S/o. Bangarayya, Hindu, aged about 62 years, Cultivation, R/o. Rachapalli Village, Makavarapalem Mandal, ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 3. The Station House Officer, Makavarapalem Police Station, Makavarapalem istrict. 4. M/s Anrak Aluminium Limited, Rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Office at APIIC Industrial Park, G Koduru Village, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering .he complaint IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. R V SATYANARAYANA, S/o. Bangarayya, Hindu, aged about 62 years, Cultivation, R/o. Rachapalli Village, Makavarapalem Mandal, ...Petitioner ncipal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The Station House Officer, Makavarapalem Police Station, Makavarapalem 4. M/s Anrak Aluminium Limited, Rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director, Office at APIIC Industrial Park, G Koduru Village, Makavarapalem ...Respondents praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering .he complaint dated. 30.03.2021 received on 02.04.2021 lodged against 4th respondent and its subordinates as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of natural justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to register the complaint dated. 30.03.2021 received on 02.04,2021 lodged against 4th respondent and its subordinates pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:P PAVAN KUMAR RAO The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12006 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering .he complaint dated. 30.03.2021 received on 02.04.2021 lodged against 4th respondent and its subordinates as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the principles of natural justice and to pass…” 02. Heard Sri K.Sai Rama Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. 03. Learned counsel for the petitioner would seek time in this matter. 04. This Writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the police for registration of the crime against the unofficial respondents on their complaint dated 30.03.2021. 05. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that police have not registered the crime basing on the complaint of the petitioner, since the subject matter is civil in nature. 06. In that view, the writ petition is disposed of. However, petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum according to the law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 27.10.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12006 OF 2021 Dated 27.10.2025 KKV