Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58159 (AP)

PROPRIETOR, M/S RANEMMA AGRO FARMS, KADAPA DIST & 4 OTHERS v. SECY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & DAIRYING, NEW DELHI & 8 OT

WP/18432/2015 · 2025-10-26

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010443152015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18432/2015 Between: 1. PROPRIETOR, M/S RANEMMA AGRO FARMS, KADAPA DIST & 4 OTHERS, K. SUBBA REDDY, S/O. K. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, D. NO: 70/56-1, ALAMKHANI PALLI ( VILLAGE & POST), KADAPA DISTRICT - 516003. 2. M/S LAKSHMI SAHASRA EMU FARM, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,, TIGARAM SURESH BABU, S/O. T. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, D.NO: 45/400-1, BALAJI NAGAR, KADAPA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT - 516 002. 3. M/S SRI VENKATESWARA EMU FARM, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR,, MR. DANDU VIJAYAA BHASKAR REDDY, S/O. D. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D.NO: 90/153, N R MATTAM, MAMILLAPALLE, KADAPA DISTRICT - 516 004. 4. MRS. VEMULA NAGA CHAITANYA,, D.NO: 6-864, VASAVI TOWERS, II FLOOR JAGGAIAHPET, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. M/S KSR AND VIJAYALAKSHMI EMU FARMS AND HATCHERIES,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K.R.K. MOHAN RAO, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D.NO: 12-41, XAVIER NAGAR, SBI COLONY, GAVARAVARAM, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 802 962 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SECY ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DAIRYING NEW DELHI, DAIRYING, 2 JS,J W.P.No.18432/2015 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, (NABARD)., 2ND FLOORM D WING G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI - 400051 REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, SHANTI NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 5. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS MANAGER, DC ROAD, KADAPA (BRANCH) KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD KADAPA MAIN BRANCH, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, 5/ 485 TRUNK ROAD, NEAR CHENNUR BUS STAND, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS MANAGER KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. BANK OF BARODA KHAMMAM BRANCH, REP. BY ITS SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER, KHAMMAM (BRANCH), KHAMMAM DISTRICT. 9. UNION BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, ELURU BRANCH, LAKSHMI COMPLEX, RAMCHANDRARAO PET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1,2 & 3 in not set up the units for purchase of all the by products such as Eggs, Meat, skin, oil, feathers, nails etc of the Emu Bird farming taken up by the petitioners are illegal, arbitrary and voilative of Article 21, 300(A) of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to bailout the petitioners from the loan sanctioned by the respondents 5 to 9 for establishing Emu Bird Farm and to pass 3 JS,J W.P.No.18432/2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 23851 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 5 to 9 not to insist for payment of the loan sanctioned for Emu Bird Farming till the scheme announced by the respondents 1&3 bailing out the loans of the petitioner sanctioned by the respondents 5 to 9 for establishing Emu Bird Farm pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. K SURYANARAYANA 3. K MALLIKARJUNA RAO 4. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) 5. PRAKASAM REDDY D The Court made the following: 4 JS,J W.P.No.18432/2015 ORDER: No representation for the petitioners. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 5th respondent – Central Bank of India submits that they have filed a Memo by stating that the matter was settled under One Time Settlement on 24.12.2018. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned Standing Counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 27.10.2025 KAS 5 JS,J W.P.No.18432/2015 145 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18432/2015 Dated: 27.10.2025 KAS