APHC010556182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28667 OF 2025 Between: 1. J DURGA, W/O LATE NAGOOR RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE 2. J.CHENCHU MEENAKSHI, D/O LATE NAGOOR RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 3. J.VENNELA, D/O LATE NAGOOR RAO, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.4-3-762/A, GIRIPURAM, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, WEST POLICE STATION,TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, WEST POLICE STATION,TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. B RAMADEVI, W/O. BASI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT SRIDEVI APARTMENT, NEAR PADMAVATHI PARK, K.B.LAYOUT. TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28667 OF 2025 ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents No. 3 and 4 as illegal and arbitrary and also direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 not to harass the Petitioners by calling and summoning them to the Police Station nor in any mode in connection with civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5. 2. Heard Mr. R. Abhishek Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr.V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Home for the Respondents No. 1 to 4. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the Petitioners No.1 to 3 and Respondent No.5 have got civil disputes. Due to which the Respondent No.3 issued a letter to Mandal Revenue Officer, Tirupati Urban Mandal with a request to conduct enquiry. During enquiry process, the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 called the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 to the Police Station and instructed not to create any law and order situation. The Respondent/ Police never interfered in civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5. 4. Recording the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.10.2025 KK