1 OD – 7 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction [Customs] ORIGINAL SIDE CUSTA/106/2024 IA NO: GA/1/2024, GA/2/2025 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) KOLKATA VS M/S PANDAW CRUISE CO. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) Date : 21st May, 2025 Appearance : Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. ..for appellant Mr. Arijit Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Prabir Bera, Adv. …for respondent The Court : There is a delay of 198 days in filing the appeal. As the delay has been properly explained, the delay condonation application [GA/1/2024] is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. This appeal has been filed by the department challenging the order dated 3.11.2023 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in Customs Appeal No.71322/2013 which was filed by the respondent and by the impugned order the appeal was allowed. 2 We have perused the order of adjudication passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Kolkata and we find that the penalty imposed on the respondent is far below the monetary limit fixed in the circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs dated 2.11.2023 which has fixed the monetary limit of Rs.1 crore for filing the appeal by the department before the High Courts. Since admittedly penalty imposed is less than Rs.1 crore, the department cannot prosecute the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low monetary limit and the substantial questions of law suggested by the department are left open. In the result, the connected application [GA/2/2025] stands closed. (T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.) S.Das/ AR[CR] 3 4