Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13369 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3510 of 2025
------ Bimal Mohli, aged about 28 years, son of Bhola Mohli, resident of Village Lakhikundi, Mohlitola, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka (Mufassil), District –Dumka (Jharkhand).
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 02.05.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 143 of 2023, arising out of Dumka (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.43 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of his wife by administering poison to her. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no eye-witness to the occurrence though five witnesses have been examined so far during the trial. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.18 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.03.2023, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above and also keeping in view the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Dumka, in connection with S.T. Case No. 143 of 2023, arising out of Dumka (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.43 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/