Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5815 (AP)

K V M SUBRAMANYAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2374/2019 · 2025-08-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010051792019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2374/2019 Between: 1. K V M SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. LATE VEERACHANDRAAO R/O. 20-268- NEAR ANANDPET MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNADIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARUAT AMARAVATHI VELAGAPUDI GUNTURU DIST 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, EBRAHIMPATNAM VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DIST 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MICHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DIST 4. THE DIST EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KRISHNA MICHILIPATNAM 5. THE HEAD MASTER, SKHUP SCHOOL RTC COLONY MICHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DIST ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction 2 more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for compassionate appointment any suitable post in the existing vacancies as per G OMS No. 10 dt 25-01-2018 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner on compassionate grounds to consider the case of the petitioner on compassionate grounds any suitable post in the existing vacancies by considering the petitioner representation dt14-03-2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner on ;compassionate grounds any suitable post in the existing vacancies by considering the petitioner representation dated 14-3-2018 pending disposal of W.P Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2374 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 15.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Revenue is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 04.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 2374 of 2019 Date: 04.08.2025 PSA