HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- MCC No. 240/2018 in OWP No. 1767/2018 c/w RP No. 45/2018 & APOWP No. 21/2018 S. Karam Singh …..Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Anidita Singh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. O. P. Thakur, Sr. Advocate Vs M/S Xtream Motor Pvt. Ltd and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R- 2 Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 05.08.2025 MCC No. 240/2018 in OWP No. 1767/2018 01. It has been fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner which has been projected in the instant review petition stands redressed and she has instructions not to proceed further in the matter. Her statement is taken on record. 02. Ordered accordingly. 03. In view of the above, the MCC No. 240/2018 is disposed of as not pressed. [ RP No. 45/2018 01. It has been fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner which has been projected in the instant review petition stands redressed and she has instructions not to proceed further in the matter. Her statement is taken on record. 02. Ordered accordingly. S. No. 03 2 03. In view of the above, the RP No. 45/2018 is disposed of as not pressed. APOWP No. 21/2018 01. It has been fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance of the petitioner which has been projected in the instant review petition stands redressed and she has instructions not to proceed further in the matter. Her statement is taken on record. 02. Ordered accordingly. 03. In view of the above, the APOWP No. 21/2018 is disposed of as not pressed. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 05.08.2025 Riya