Prakash Ananda Patil v. Balkrushana Vikram Patil and ors
CA/496/2025 · 2025-05-07
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5814 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5814 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
56-CA-496-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2025 IN SAST/1185/2025 PRAKASH ANANDA PATIL VERSUS BALKRUSHANA VIKRAM PATIL AND ORS ... Mr. Bramhankar Rakesh Chandrakant, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Jitendra Patil, Advocate for Respnodents .…
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 07.05.2025 PER COURT :- . Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. By this application, applicants seek to condone the delay of 18 days caused in filing appeal.
3. Perused application and reasons as stated therein. Sufficient cause is made out to condone delay. Hence, following
order: ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. b. Delay of 18 days caused in filing appeal is hereby condoned. c. Appeal be registered.
[ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1 2025:BHC-AUG:13770