1 / 2 2025:CGHC:53199 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5684 of 2025 • Raghuvanshmani Khairwar S/o Late Lalaram Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Mendra, Post Office Saida, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer Revenue (Sdo) Sub-Divisional Office Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Tehsildar Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4. Halka Patwari R.N.M. Pendari Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5. Jaitram Nirmalkar S/o Dashru R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6. Narayan Dubey S/o Hari Prasad R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 7. Shivkumar Shrivas S/o Bahoran R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8. Prahlad Nirmalkar S/o Dashru R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9. Punnilal Suryawanshi S/o Dashrath R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 10.Radhe Nirmalkar S/o Johan R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 11. Sanju Nirmalkar S/o Jeevan R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 12.Sakharam Nirmalkar S/o Bolwa R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 13.Lakhanbai Khairwan W/o Raghu R/o Village Mendra, Tehsil Sakri, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 31/10/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 Issue a suitable writ, direction or order, specifically a writ of mandamus, compelling the Respondents No. 3 & 4 to immediately and compulsory execute the mandatory directions contained in the order dated 19.07.2019 (Annexure P-1). 10.2 That the Respondent No. 4 be specifically directed to complete the investigation, demarcate the Government Grassland (Khasra No. 374/1, area 1.14 acres) and submit the required report on the illegal occupation and the basis of other partitions of Khasra No. 374, within a strict, time bound period as fixed by this Hon’ble Court. 10.3 Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned State counsel raises objection that this writ petition is filed seeking compliance of order Annexure P-1 & P-2, however, petitioner is not the party to the said proceedings nor he is legal representative of any of the party as named therein. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner being one of the resident of the area has filed this petition. 4. In the aforementioned facts of the case, no relief as prayed for by the petitioner in this writ petition can be granted. If petitioner is aggrieved for any of the reason with regard to non-conducting demarcation, he is having efficacious remedy under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 for redressal of his grievance. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE