Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5810 (RAJ)

JUGAL SINGH @ BANTI SINGH S/O BHANWAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1718/2025 · 2025-02-14

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6718] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1718/2025 Jugal Singh @ Banti Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Parebadi Police Station Chitaba, District Deedwana- Kuchaman, Rajasthan (At Present Sub Jail Sikar Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 14/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.07/2025 registered at Police Station Dhod, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is money dispute between the accused- petitioner and complainant. It is contended that the cheque was handed over to the accused-petitioner by the Mukesh Kumar, who is the brother of complainant Shyam Lal. The accused-petitioner withdrew the amount through cheque and he neither committed any theft nor instigated the child in conflict with law to hand over the cheques and ornaments. The recovery of ornaments were [2025:RJ-JP:6718] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1718/2025] effected from Suman Kanwar. It is further contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and he is in custody since 12.01.2025. The matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.01.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jugal Singh @ Banti Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, in connection with FIR No.07/2025 registered at Police Station Dhod, District Sikar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/235