SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010186302025 BA1/2275/2025 Pintu Alias Aman Gangwar --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Dr. Udyog Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant “Pintu @ Aman Gangwar, son of Jamuna Prasad”, is praying for regular bail in reference to FIR dated 19.09.2025 bearing FIR No. 317 of 2025 registered at Police Station – Sitarganj, District – Udham Singh Nagar, wherein present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 109 (1) and 352 of BNS, 2023. In this FIR, after investigation, applicant has been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 109 (1) and 352 of BNS, 2023. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and there is no recovery of weapon or cooker, which according to the prosecution, was used at the commission of crime and charge sheet has already been filed and applicant is languishing in jail since 20.09.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedents. 5. He further submits that the proceedings of the trial court have been challenged before this Court in C528 No. 418 of 2026 along with compounding application wherein the complainant have stated that she has settled her dispute amicably and do not want to proceed with the trial. 6. Ms. Gyanmati Kushwaha, learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant filed the compounding application subject to the condition that applicant will bear all her medical expenses. 7. On the other side, learned State Counsel have not disputed that C528 No. 418 of 2026 has been filed along with compounding application and applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and applicant is languishing in jail since 20.09.2025. 8. After hearing the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 25.09.2025 and charge sheet has already been filed, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves for bail. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant “Pintu @ Aman Gangwar, son of Jamuna Prasad”, be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties, each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the condition that after being released on bail, he will not give any threat to the victim or her family members. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.07.2026 SKS