APHC010049192015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15168/2015 Between: 1. M/S. SRIMAN HANUMAN EMU FARM,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, U. SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NEELADRIPURAM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. M/S. SRI SAI GOLD EMU FARMS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, K. ANURADHA RANI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, MADAVARIGUDEM, GANAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & DAIRYING, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, (NABARD), 2ND FLOORM D WING G BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI - 400051 REP. BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, SHANTI NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 5. PANJAB NATIONAL BANK REP BY ITS MANAGER 2 JS, J W.P.No.15168/2015 TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SYNDICATE BANK, REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER, SMC BRANCH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1,2 & 3 in not set up the units for purchase of all the by products such as Eggs, Meat, skin, oil, feathers, nails etc of the Emu Bird farming taken up by the petitioners are illegal, arbitrary and voilative of Article 21, 300(A) of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to bailout the petitioners from the loan sanctioned by the 5th & 6th respondents for establishing Emu Bird Farm IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 19763 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th & 6th respondents not to insist for payment of the loan sanctioned for Emu Bird Farming till the scheme announced by the respondents 1 & 3 bailing out the loans of the petitioners sanctioned by the 5th & 6th respondents for establishing Emu Bird Farm pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.15168/2015 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Appadhara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 27.10.2025 SCH 4 JS, J W.P.No.15168/2015 347 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15168/2015 Date: 27.10.2025 SCH