- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7523-DB CCC No. 100211 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100211 OF 2024 BETWEEN: DANAVVA, W/O LATE GADIGAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC. RTD., R/O. KOTI ONI, KAMALAPUR, DHARWAD. - COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S.H. BALAGANNAVAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SRIKAR M S, THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, VIDHANASOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. M. DHANANJAYA, THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, (COLLEGIATE EDUCATION), BENGALURU-560001. 3. JAGADEESHA G, THE COMMISSIONER, COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, TANTRIK BHAVAN, 2ND FLOOR, BENGALURU-560001. 4. DR. M. RAMEGOWDA, THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.06.12 10:42:18 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7523-DB CCC No. 100211 of 2024 COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, DHARWAD-580001. 5. ANAND BANDI SECRETARY, HURAKADLI AJJA SIKSHANA SAMITI, NEAR R.N. SHETTY PLAYGROUND, DHARWAD-580001. - ACCUSED 6. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD, R/BY ITS HCGP. - PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A4 AND PROFORMA RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 23.09.2020 PASSED IN WP NO.108889/2014 (LA-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND MEET-OUT PUNISHMENT UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT 1971 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7523-DB CCC No. 100211 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.DEVDAS) On 04.06.2025 the following order was passed. “Case is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of hearing there was no representation for the petitioner. The office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the contempt petition. Relist this case on 11.06.2025. If there is no representation for the petitioner on the next date of hearing, the contempt petition will be dismissed.” Case is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. Consequently, the contempt petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (R.DEVDAS) JUDGE Sd/- (K V ARAVIND) JUDGE BVV, CT: VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4