Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5809 (ALL)

LAKSHMI NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/166/2025 · 2025-01-09

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:5540 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 166 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lakshmi Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arti Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition with the following prayer:- "(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent authorities to make payment of dues of G.P.F. (General Provident Fund), amount of Gratuity, amount of commutation of pension as per the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission after re-fixing his salary by granting him his due annual increments for the year 01.07.2008, 01.07.2009, 01.07.2012, 01.07.2014, 01.07.2017, 01.07.2018, 01.07.2019, 01.07.2020 and 01.07.2021 and also clear his due of House Rent Allowance and Transport Allowance for the period mentioned in his representation dated 25.06.2022 after calculating the dues which have not been paid till date to the petitioner alongwith interest @ 18% on the total amount due to be paid to the Petitioner w.e.f. 30.11.2021 i.e. date of retirement of the Petitioner till the date of actual payment to the Petitioner." 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner while working on the post of Tehsildar, Jhansi superannuated on 30.11.2021. It is argued that though after his retirement he is entitled for the service benefits but the same were not given to the petitioner. In this regard, representations have been made by learned counsel for the petitioner before the respondent- authorities but till date no decision has been taken in the matter. 3. On the other hand, it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that in case, the petitioner will make fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the concerned competent authority, he will take a decision in the matter expeditiously. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to file fresh representation ventilating all his grievances before the concerned competent authority along with certified copy of this order within three weeks from today. In case, the aforesaid representation will file within the aforesaid period, the concerned competent authority will take a decision in the matter most expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months thereafter. Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Arti Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad