1 2025:CGHC:53061 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 7770 of 2025 1 - David Kunjam Alias Aryan S/o Late Yashwant Kunjam Aged About 19 Years R/o Salhe Bhat Ward No. 19, P.S. Keregaon, Distt. Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. (Particulars Of The Applicant Is Not Properly Mentioned In The Impugned Order sheet Which Is Being Mentioned As Per The Charge Sheet ) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho P.S. Sanaud, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Shri Amit Nayak, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. GA (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 30/10/2025 The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrrik Suraksha Sanhita for grant of regular bail as he is 2 in custody in connection with Crime No. 25/2025 registered at police station Sanaud, District Balod (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) and 64(2)(m) of BNS and Sections 4 & 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. 2. Prosecution case in brief is that report was lodged by the father of the victim that his daughter has been allured by some unknown peron and subjected her to rape. It is alleged that the prosecutrix and the applicant were having love affair. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that there was love affair between the applicant and the prosecutrix and she went along with the applicant of her own, stayed with him and developed physical relations. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 24.03.2025, the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, he is ready and willing to comply with any of the conditions which may be imposed upon him and thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed and the applicant be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the bail application. 5. Victim and her father appeared through the concerned DLSA and have raised no objection. 6. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. On due consideration of the rival submissions and the fact that the applicant is in jail since 24.03.2025, the charge sheet has been filed 3 and looking to the fact that the final disposal of the trial is likely to take sufficiently long time, the present application deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, his bail application is allowed. 8. It is directed that in the event of applicant executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety to the satisfaction of the concerned trial court, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions: i) He/she shall appear before the trial court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. ii) He/she shall not make any attempt to tamper with the prosecution witnesses. Iii) the applicant is directed not to communicate/contact in any manner with the prosecutrix, her family members and the witnesses cited in the charge sheet any other person concerned or attempt to ask for any favour in the trial directly or indirectly. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.11.01 16:20:08 +0530