.Kondeti Surya Durga Lakshmi, v. The Government of Andra Pradesh
WP/22002/2021 · 2025-10-26
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58083 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58083 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010361302021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22002 OF 2021 Between:
1. .Kondeti Surya Durga Lakshmi,, W/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 62 years, Occ Business,
2. Kondeti Subba Raju, , S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 35 years, Occ Business,
3. Kondeti Sai Krishna,, S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 31 years, Occ Business, (All are R/o. D.No.10 Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 1. The Government of Andra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director, General of Police, Government of Andra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada. 4. The Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. 5. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 55 years, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 22002 OF 2021
1. .Kondeti Surya Durga Lakshmi,, W/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 62 years, Occ Business,
2. Kondeti Subba Raju, , S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 35 years, Occ Business, Sai Krishna,, S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged about 31 years, Occ Business, (All are R/o. D.No.10-2-112, Nalla Street, Amalapuram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND
1. The Government of Andra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director, General of Police, Government of Andra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District, Kakinada. House Officer, Town Police Station, Amalapuram, East
5. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 55 years, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
1. .Kondeti Surya Durga Lakshmi,, W/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana,
2. Kondeti Subba Raju, , S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged Sai Krishna,, S/o. Late Bhima Sankara Satya Narayana, aged 112, Nalla Street, ...Petitioners
1. The Government of Andra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2.
The Director, General of Police, Government of Andra Pradesh,
House Officer, Town Police Station, Amalapuram, East
5. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged 55 years,
2
6. Koduri Satya Srinivas, S/o. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, Aged about 34 years,
7. Koduri Ajay Kumar, S/o. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, Aged about 31 years,
8. Koduri Durga Prasad, S/o. Koduri Machara Pattabhi Ramarao, Aged about 29 years, (Respondents No. 5 to 8 are.R/o. D.No.8-1-63, Garapativari Street, Amalapuram, Amalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to to declaring the high handed action on part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent deleberately interfering the civil disputes influenced by the un-official respondents No. 5 to 8 threatening the petitioners and preventing them to entering into their property of running Hotel on the name and style of Ganapathi Sai Sree Hotel Sathkar(Hotel Bording and Lodging) D.No.3-1-71 in SyNo.421/8, 421/10 Amalapuram Town even though Civil Suit in O.S.No.15/2020 which is pending before the II addl.Dist Judge Court at Amalapuram filed by the un-official respondents No.5 to 8 without giving protection to the petitioners as per the complaint dt 21-8-2021 is illegal, arbitrary and violatve of the article 14,16,21 of the constitution of India consequentially to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner in Civil Disputes in respect of O.S.No.15/2020 of the property and bussiness of Hotel namelyM/s. Ganapathi Sai Sri Hotel Satkar (Hotel Bording and Lodging) D.No.3-1-71 in SyNo.421/8, 421/10 Amalapuram Town by take action as per .the complaint of the petitioners dt 21-8-2021 for protection infavor of them and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021
3
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner in Civil Disputes in respect of O.S.No.15/2020 of the property and bussiness of Hotel namely "M/s. Ganapathi Sai Sri Hotel Satkar" (Hotel Bording and Lodging) D.No.3-1-71 in SyNo.421/8, 421/10 Amalapuram Town by take action as per the complaint of the petitioners dt 21-8-2021 for protection infavor of them pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioners: BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following order:
4
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22002 OF 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…declaring the high handed action on part of the respondents herein more particularly 4th respondent deleberately interfering the civil disputes influenced by the un-official respondents No. 5 to 8 threatening the petitioners and preventing them to entering into their property of running Hotel on the name and style of Ganapathi Sai Sree Hotel Sathkar(Hotel Bording and Lodging) D.No.3-1-71 in SyNo.421/8, 421/10 Amalapuram Town even though Civil Suit in O.S.No.15/2020 which is pending before the II addl.Dist Judge Court at Amalapuram filed by the un-official respondents No.5 to 8 without giving protection to the petitioners as per the complaint dt 21-8-2021 is illegal, arbitrary and violatve of the article 14,16,21 of the constitution of India consequentially to direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner in Civil Disputes in respect of O.S.No.15/2020 of the property and bussiness of Hotel namelyM/s. Ganapathi Sai Sri Hotel Satkar (Hotel Bording and Lodging) D.No.3- 1-71 in SyNo.421/8, 421/10 Amalapuram Town by take action as per .the complaint of the petitioners dt 21-8-2021 for protection infavor of them and to pass….”
2. None represented for the petitioners.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police have never interfered in the dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent relating to the subject matter in O.S.No.15 of 2020 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Amalapuram. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would further submit that a crime has been registered on the complaint made by the petitioners as Crime No.33 of 2021 by the Amalapuram Police.
5
5. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 27.10.2025 KKV
6
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
114
WRIT PETITION NO: 22002 OF 2021
Dated 27.10.2025 KKV