APHC010163532019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7101/2019 Between: 1. KANCHARLA BOSU BABU,, S/O. YESUPADAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE LECTURER R/O. DOOR NO.8-55, NUTHAKKI VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI POLICE STATION, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. DASARI ISRAIL, , S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC R/O. NUTAKKI VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KANCHARLA HANUMAIAH, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC RIO. VENGALARAO NAGAR, NAMBURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KANCHARLA SAMRAJYAM, W/O. HANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. VENGALARAO NAGAR, NAMBURU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 7. AVETHU PRAKASH REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE SURVEYOR, R/O.NUTHAKKI VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. P V V SATHYANARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, R/O.NUTHAKKI VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. SRINIVASULU P The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7101 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in acting on the complaint, dated 27-04-2019 and registering the crime against the respondent No.4 to 8 as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to act on the compliant, dated 27-04- 2019 submitted by the petitioner and take action against the respondent No.4 to 8 and to pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner is in attendance. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that civil dispute is pending between the rival parties and the dispute is of civil in nature. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the petitioner is at liberty to approach concerned Magistrate for necessary redressal in accordance with law in the light of judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of 4 M.Subramaniam and Another, Appellants Vs. S.Janaki and Another, Respondents1 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 27.10.2025 Pmk 1 (2020 SCC Online SC 341) 5 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:7101 OF 2019 Date: 27.10.2025 Pmk