1 2025:CGHC:53280-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2099 of 2022 1 - Sanjay Thawait & Another S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Thawait, Aged About 52 Years Caste Barai, R/o Qtr No. C-40, Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra, Police Station Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Kiran Mahant D/o Shri Surendra Mahant, Aged About 22 Years R/o T.R. Patel Colony, Piparmaar, Dharamjaygarh, Police Station Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer Officer, Police Station City Kotwali, Raigarh District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - In - Charge Of Mahila Cell, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Inspector General Of Police, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Director General Of Police, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Pravin Minj, S/o Donatoos Minj, Aged About 38 Years At Present R/o - Village Gharghoda, Police Station Gharghora, District Raigarh (C.G.), Permanent Address At Village Chota Galonda, Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 7 - Vikram Mandal S/o Shri Manoranjan Mandal, R/o Premnagar Baysi Colony, Dharamjaygarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate For State/respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 31 . 10 .202 5 1. Heard Mr. Sudeep Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent Nos.1 to 5, Mr. Hari Agrawal, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.6 and Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No.7. 2. The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers : “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash the FIR in crime no. 1365/2022 of S.H.O. City Kotwali, Raigarh, District Raigarh and its further consequences, against the petitioners for the offence punishable under section 389 and 34 of IPC against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as the charge- sheet has already been submitted and charges have also been framed, therefore, he wants to withdraw the instant petition to challenge the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra