Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58056 (ALL)

PRATIMA SARASWAT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6857/2025 · 2025-09-08

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6857 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the direction upon the respondent authority to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner with regard to the transfer from District Bijnor to District Moradabad pending before the authority concerned, within a short stipulated period as may be specified by this Hon'ble Court." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that her representations dated 25.01.2025 and 24.02.2025, which are pending before respondent no.2, may be directed to be decided in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 within ten days from the production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pratima Saraswat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 Pratima WRIA No. 6857 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATIMA AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad