APHC010121682014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34751/2014 Between: 1. MR. KALYANAM BHASKAR RAO, KRISHNA DIST, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. NAGAYYA, R/O. METTAGUDEM VILLAGE, GAMPALAGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SECY ANIMAL HUSB DAIRYING NEW DELHI 2 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY & DAIRYING, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 2. NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, (NABARD) 2ND FLOOR, D WING, G BLOCK, BANDRA KURIA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI-40005 I REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER. 3. ANDHRA BANK, VIJAYAWADA BRANCH, REP BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the respondents 1 & 2 to set up units for purchase of all the byproducts such as Eggs, Meat, skin, oil, feathers, nails etc of the Emu bird farming taken up by the petitioner through their 2 JS,J W.P.No.34751/2014 National Level Joint Monitoring Committee or any other competent unit or alternately bail out the petitioner from the loan of the 3rd respondent vide Sanction Lr No 0689/19/PEN-06/98 dated 1.08.2012, and do justice to the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 43470 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate directions to the respondents to defer the repayment of the loan of the petitioner to the 3rd respondent till the marketing units are setup/identified by the respondents where the farmers such as the petitioner may be able to sell the products and by products of Emu Birds or any other scheme is announced by the 1st respondent bailing out the petitioner from the Vide Sanction Lr.No.0689/19/PEN-06/98 dated 1.08.2012 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.34751/2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.34751/2014 312 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34751/2014 Dated: 24.10.2025 KAS