1 APHC010847222016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36407/2016 Between: T.k.narasimhulu, S/o.t.kadirappa, ...PETITIONER AND The Presiding Officer Central Govt Industrial Tribunal and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEEPIKA GADDE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K LAKSHMAN (AST SOL GEN) 2. V UMA DEVI The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more fully one in the nature of Writ of MandaMus declaring the Award of the 1st respondent herein in L C I D No 194/2004 dated 26.06.2009 holding that the termination of the service of the petitioner is justified as illegal arbitrary bad in law and excess utilization of its power 2 and consequently direct the respondents to engage petitioner and regularize in service in the due course....” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y.Sita Ram, learned counsel, representing Smt.Deepika Gadde, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 28.10.2025. Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.36407 of 2016 28.10.2025 Asr