APHC010539822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10830 of 2025 Between: 1. IMRAN AHAMAD ANSARI @ MOHAMMAD, S/O RIYAZ AHMAD ANSARI AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O NEAR MOHAMMAD MASIJID, PENSION LINE LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, 48 DIVISION, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. 2. MD ABDULLAH KHAN, S/O SAIDULLHA KHAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, D.NO. 17-6-2, NEAR MOHAMMAD MASIJD, PENSION LINE LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, 48 DIVISION, ELURU. ELURU 3. MOHAMMAD MUKEEM KHAN, S/O MAJJULLA KHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, D.NO.17-6-2, NEAR MOHAMMAD MASIJD, PENSION LINE LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, 48 DIVISION, ELURU. ELURU 4. MAHBOOBALI @MOHAMMAD MAHABOOB SHAH, S/O AASHIQU ALI AGED 34 YEARS. NEAR MOHAMMAD MASIJD, PENSION LINE LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, 48 DIVISION, ELURU. ELURU 5. ANNE KHAN S/O ANVARUL HAQKHAN,, AGE 35 YEARS, MOHAMMAD MASIJID , PENSION LINE LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, 48 DIVISION, ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THROUGH ELURU II TOWN PS ELURU, HIGH COURT OF A.P AT AMARAVATHI. 2. MOHAMMAD USMAN KHANHUSSEMAN, S/O GULAM MUSTAFA KHAN AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O 7TH ROAD, SANTHI NAGAR ELURU. ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 5, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.61 of 2025 of Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru District registered for the offences under Sections 118(1) and 115(2) read with 3(5) of BNS. 2. I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2 seeking permission to compound the offences and to record the compromise between him and the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5. 3. Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement for withdrawal of the case in Crime No.61 of 2025 of Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru District pending between them. Respondent No.2 submits that, he is not interested to prosecute the matter and that they compromised the matter and hence, the case may be closed. 5. Considering the submissions, in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and another1, 1 2012(10)SCC 303 3 since there is an amicable settlement between them, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.61 of 2025 of Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru District, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.10.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 10830 of 2025 Dt.23.10.2025 Asr