Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40559 WP No. 18035 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 18035 OF 2022 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT PRIYANKA W/O SRI ABHIJITH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA KORAMANGALA BRANCH, R/AT NO.A-128, TRINITY MEADOWS APARTMENT, BELLANDUR MAIN ROAD BELLANDUR BANGALORE-560103
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN J N.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE CHIEF MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA NO.92, 80 FEET ROAD,
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40559 WP No. 18035 of 2022
6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560095
2.
THE REGIONAL MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA 1ST FLOOR, SANTHOSH CINEMA COMPLEX, K G ROAD BANGALORE-560009 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VENUGOPAL M.S., ADVOCATE FOR 1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFICE ORDER DTD.26.4.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-2 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-X TO THE W.P. IN SO FAR IT CONCERN TO THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40559 WP No. 18035 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner, aggrieved by the order of transfer dated 26.04.2022 issued by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-X, filed this writ petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that subsequent to the filing of this writ petition the respondent has passed another transfer order in the month of May 2025 transferring the petitioner to another region i.e., Hyderabad zone. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said order of transfer is not communicated to the petitioner.
4. In view of the subsequent order of transfer, the writ petition does not survive for
consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40559 WP No. 18035 of 2022
5. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the alleged subsequent order of transfer.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22