Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58033 (KAR)

SMT THIMMAKKA v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

WP/21386/2025 · 2025-07-29

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29265 WP No. 21386 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21386 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT THIMMAKKA D/O LATE GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS SAKKAREGOLLAHALLI POST, DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI, R/AT GUNDLAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. PIN-561 204. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. OMKARA MURTHY G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ARAVINDA BHAVANA BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SRI. ANJINAMURTHY S/O LATE GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. 3. SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE GANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29265 WP No. 21386 of 2025 4. SRI. NANJUNDAPPA S/O LATE ANJANI AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. 5. SMT. NARASAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS. 6. SMT. MANJULA D/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R2 TO R6 ARE R/AT KARIMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. PIN-562 132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.N. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 0PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS DATED 07.03.2024 AND 24.06.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNX-J AND K AND NOT TO DISBURSE THE COMPENSATION AMOUNT TO THE R-2 TO 7 ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29265 WP No. 21386 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “It is submitted that the dispute is settled with the respondent No.7 and it is agreed to enter into compromise in O.S.No.1156/2023 pending before the Civil Court and hence the above case may be dismissed as withdrawn.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 70