APHC010072862017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19691/2017 Between: 1. KURAPATI RAMANJANAMMA,, W/O. SRI K. RAMALINGAIAH, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC: CLUSTER LEVEL RESOURCE PRESON (CLRP), 0/O. MISSION FOR ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN MUNICIPAL AREAS, (MEPMA), KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 2. K.KALPANA,, W/O. ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: CLUSTER LEVEL RESOURCE PRESON (CLRP), 0/O. MISSION FOR ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN MUNICIPAL AREAS, (MEPMA), KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 3. B. NAGASUBBAMMA,, W/O. RAVI KUMAR, AGE 36 YARS, OCC; CLUSTER LEVEL RESOURCE PRESON (CLRP), 0/O. MISSION FOR ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN MUNICIPAL AREAS, (MEPMA), KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 4. SAI LATHA,, W/O. RAVI, AGE 37 YEARS, OCC: CLUSTER LEVEL RESOURCE PRESON (CLRP), 0/O. MISSION FOR ELIMINATION OF POVERTY IN MUNICIPAL AREAS, (MEPMA), KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR, NATIONAL URBAN LIVELY HOOD MISSION,. NEW DELHI, INDIA. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, URBAN, IKP, (MEPMA), KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 3. ANDHRA PRADESH HUMAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP.BY MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent not considering the 2 candidature of the petitioners for promotion to the post of Community Organizers from outsourcing to regular employment is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to take any coercive steps for appointment of Community Organizers in respect of the petitioners in pursuance of the Notification 1/2017, dated: 31.03.2017 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 24042 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to take any coercive steps for appointment of Community Organizers as per the notification No.1/ 2017 Dt. 31.03.2017 by renewing the petitioners employment as a Cluster Level Resource Preson (CLRP), pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M. Ramprasad, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to work-out other remedies available in law. 2. Permission is accorded and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.10.2025 GVK 3 43 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.19691 of 2016 Date: 28.10.2025 GVK 4