Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 58012 (AP)

T. Rajashekarappa, v. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meena,

CC/3688/2024 · 2025-10-22

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363482024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3688/2024 Between: 1. T. RAJASHEKARAPPA,, S/O. T. ESWARAPPA, AGED 84 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT D.NO.8/20, MAIN ROAD, BUDILI VILLAGE, GORANTIA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MR T S CHETHAN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. SMT BHAGYA REKHA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PUTTAPARTHY DIVISION, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. MR IQBAL, TAHSILDAR, GORANTIA MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT 5. MR K VENKAT NARAYANA, SUB-REGISTRAR, CHILAMATOOR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. C KALPANA, W/O. CHANDRASEKHAR, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.7/2/28/B, SRI VASAVI DHARMASHALA ROAD, HINDUPUR VILLAGE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 7. T N SURESH NAIK, S/O TIRUMALA NAGARAJU, AGED 40 YEARS, 2 OCC BUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO.13-11-6, BANGALORE ROAD, HINDUPUR VILLAGE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under section 10 to 12 of the contempt of courts Act for their willful, intentional, and deliberate action in violating the orders dated 06.02.2024 passed in I.A. No. 2 of 2024 in W.P. No. 3182 of 2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to add the 7th respondent as party to the contempt proceedings and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M V J K KUMAR 2. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3688/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.02.2024 passed by this Court in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in W.P.No.3182 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.T.Sri Lakshmi, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the order dated 06.02.2024 passed by this Court in I.A.No.2 of 2024 in W.P.No.3182 of 2024, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 23.10.2025 TTPPSS 4 31 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3688/2024 23.10.2025 TTPPSS