APHC010444432021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26934 OF 2021 Between: 1. Smt.P.Maddamma, W/o Pagidala Chinna Ayyanna aged about 58 years, R/o H.No.2-79, Lakshmipuram (V), Kalluru (M), Kurnool Dt. 2. E.C.Vijay Kumar, S/o E.Nagabhushanam, aged about 36 Years, R/o H.No.50-761-C6, Devnagar, Ku 1. THE STATE OF AP, through its Prl., Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool 518 002 3. The Station House Officer, Ulendakonda P.S., Kurnool 4. The Waqf Inspector, A.P.State Waqf Board International Hotel Building, R.S. Road, Kurnool Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to pleased to issue writ, orders or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 not to interfere with IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 26934 OF 2021 1. Smt.P.Maddamma, W/o Pagidala Chinna Ayyanna aged about 58 years, 79, Lakshmipuram (V), Kalluru (M), Kurnool Dt. 2. E.C.Vijay Kumar, S/o E.Nagabhushanam, aged about 36 Years, R/o C6, Devnagar, Kurnool 518002 ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, through its Prl., Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool 518 002 3. The Station House Officer, Ulendakonda P.S., Kurnool 4. The Waqf Inspector, A.P.State Waqf Board International Hotel Building, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue writ, orders or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 not to interfere with IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Smt.P.Maddamma, W/o Pagidala Chinna Ayyanna aged about 58 years, 2. E.C.Vijay Kumar, S/o E.Nagabhushanam, aged about 36 Years, R/o ...Petitioners 1. THE STATE OF AP, through its Prl., Secretary, Home Department, 4. The Waqf Inspector, A.P.State Waqf Board International Hotel Building, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, orders or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the respondent No.4 in respect of Ac.6.16 cts in Sy.No.738 Lakshmipuram (V), Kalluru (M), Kurnool Dt., declaring his action as violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being contemptuous directing not to interfere with the civil dispute and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the respondent No.4 in respect of Ac.6.16 cts in Sy.No.738 Lakshmipuram (V), Kalluru (M), Kurnool Dt., pending W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SAI RAMA SHARMA V Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 26934 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue writ, orders or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent No.3 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioners and the respondent No.4 in respect of Ac.6.16 cts in Sy.No.738 Lakshmipuram (V), Kalluru (M), Kurnool Dt., declaring his action as violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being contemptuous directing not to interfere with the civil dispute and to pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioners. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that the police never interfered into the land dispute between the parties and never called the petitioners to the police station as the dispute over them is civil in nature. 4. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 27.10.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 129 W.P.No.26934 of 2021 Dated: 27.10.2025 KKV