Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010450992021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27293/2021 Between:
1. GAJJALA VEMA REDDY, S/O. RAJA REDDY, AGE. 38 YEARS, 0CC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. 6-73, GAJJALAVANDLA PALLI VILLAGE, GANDLAPENTA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, 0/O. SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, AT ANATHAPURAMU ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KADIRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADIRI RURAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANDLAPENTA POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly
2
one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents No.4 and 5 in harassing the petitioner by demanding not to live in the village Le, Gajjalavandla Palli Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, Andhra Pradesh and insisting the petitioner to get permission from the 2nd respondent to live in the village as illegal, arbitrary against the violation of fundamental right particularly Article 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and un-constitution and consequently to direct the 4th and 5' respondents not to harassing the petitioner by demanding not to live in the village 1,e, Gajjalavandla Palli Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, Andhra Pradesti by insisting the petitioner to get permission from the 2nd respondent to live in the village and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to harassing the petitioner by demanding not to live in the village Ile, Gajjalavandla Palli Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, Andhra Pradesh by insisting the petitioner to get permission from the 2nd respondent to live in the village forthwith, pending disposal of the present writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27293/2021
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the respondents No.4 and 5 in harassing the petitioner by demanding not to live in the village I,e, Gajjalavandla Palli Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, Andhra Pradesh and insisting the petitioner to get permission from the 2nd respondent to live in the village as illegal, arbitrary against the violation of fundamental right particularly Article 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and un-constitution and consequently to direct the 4th and 5' respondents not to harassing the petitioner by demanding not to live in the village I,e, Gajjalavandla Palli Village, Gandlapenta Mandal, Ananthapuram District, Andhra Pradesh by insisting the petitioner to get permission from the 2nd respondent to live in the village…”
2. Heard Sri Dr.Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.10.2025 JLV
4
307 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 27293/2021
Dt.24.10.2025
JLV