G.Dhruva Jyothi W/o. G.Praveenkumar Reddy, v. The State of A.P. represented by its Secretary, Medical
WP/15904/2017 · 2025-10-26
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58007 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 58007 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010029792017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15904/2017 Between:
1. G.DHRUVA JYOTHI W/O. G.PRAVEENKUMAR REDDY,, UN EMPLOYEE, R/O H.NO.2-55, GUNDLAKUNTA VILLAGE AND POST, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. C.AMARAVATHI D/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH,, R/O H.NO. 10-391-A, DURGAPURAM VILLAGE, S.T.COLONY, NANDALURU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. M.DIVYALAKSHMI D/O CHANDRASEKHAR,, R/O D.NO. 8/255, SREERAMULU PETA, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. V.SUPRAJA D/O SUBBARAYUDU,, R/O H.NO. 9/54, K.BUDDAYAPALLI VILLAGE, SIDDANTIPETA POST, KHAZIPET MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. P.SOBHARANI W/O SURESHBABU,, R/O H.NO. 4/274, RAMCHANDRANAGAR, KODAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. K.CHAMUNDESWARI D/O SUBBARAYUDU,, R/O H.NO. 7/442, NEW KRISHNANAGAR, RLY KODURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. B.KALYANI RANI W/O K.BALAJI,, R/O H.NO. 28/75-2, NEAR RAMESWARAM WATER TANK, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF A P REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MEDICAL, AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, A.P.
2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA
3. THE DISTRICT COORDINATOR OF HOSPITAL SERVICES APVVP, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR YSR KADAPA DISTRICT KADAPA, -
5. THE MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT DISTRICT HOSPITAL PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass orders particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents refusing to admit the petitioners to duty as per Rc.No. Staff Nurses/NHM/DCHS/2016 dt. 20.4.2017 of the 3rd respondent without assigning any valid reason as arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires and violative of Art 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to forth with admit the petitioners to duty IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 19567 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th respondent to acknowledge the joining report submitted by the petitioners and allow them to discharge their duties as per Rc. No. Staff Nurses/ NHM/DCHS/2016 dt. 20-04-2017 of the 3rd pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW(AP)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15904/2017
ORDER:
When the matter is called, Sri K. Sudheer, learned counsel representing Sri Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Date: 27.10.2025 ANS
53 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 15904/2017 Date: 27.10.2025 ANS