Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57993 (KAR)

SRI K V YOGANARASIMHAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/33451/2025 · 2025-11-11

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45928 WP No. 33451 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 33451 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI K V YOGANARASIMHAIAH S/O K.V VEERAKYATHAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT GOPAGONDANAHLLI, VEDERAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI MAGHUGIRI TALUK TUMKUR DIST-572132 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF KARNATAKA M.S BUILDING BENGALURU 560001 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45928 WP No. 33451 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR DISTRICT TUMKURU 572101 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MADHUGIRI SUB-DIVISION MADHUGIRI TUMKUR DISTRICT 572132 4. THE TAHSILDHAR MADHUGIRI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT -572312 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER ON 05.03.2020 AND RE INSTATE THE PETITIONER TO THE POST OF GRAMA SAHAYAKA FOR THE REST OF HIS TERM COMMENCING FROM THE DATE OF HIS FORCED DISPLACEMENT ON AS PER THE ANNX-J DATED 05.03.2020. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45928 WP No. 33451 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned senior counsel Mr. S. Sreevatsa appearing for the petitioner filed a memo dated 11.11.2025, seeking the leave of this court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh representation to the respondents and with a direction to the respondents to consider a fresh representation in accordance with law within time bound. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the respondents within 15 days from today. 5. If such representation is made, the respondents are directed to consider the representation and pass an - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45928 WP No. 33451 of 2025 appropriate order in accordance with law within 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV