SHEETAL SHARMA AND OTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/14009/2025 · 2025-09-08
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57976 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57976 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
266
CWP-14009-2025
Date of Decision: 08.09.2025
Sheetal Sharma and others
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Parveen Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advocate, and Ms. Manreet Kaur, Advocate, Ms. Anisha Rana, Advocate for respondent no.2/HSSPP
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue appointments to the petitioners on the post of Special Educator pursuant to selection process carried out in terms of advertisement dated 29.06.2022.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 contends that the advertisement in question has been withdrawn by the Parishad vide public notice dated 02.09.2025.
3.
In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous and stands disposed of as such with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the withdrawal of advertisement, if so advised.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 08.09.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2025.09.10 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment