Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57971 (KAR)

SRI K VENUGOPAL v. SMT H SUMA

WP/21837/2023 · 2025-07-29

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29007 WP No. 21837 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 21837 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. K.VENUGOPAL S/O KANDASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O NO. 802/42-1, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS, PRAKASH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 021. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DAYALU.K.N., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. H.SUMA W/O PRAKASH.K.S., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF M/S. SRI.DURGA PEBBLES INDUSTRY, R/O KAMAKKA BUILDING, OPP. SBM, SIRA GATE, TUMKUR-572 106. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29007 WP No. 21837 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Sri.Dayalu.K.N., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to dismiss the Writ petition as not pressed and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6