SMT. S H MEENAKSHI v. SRI G BISKURAPPA @ PUTTASWAMAIAH
MFA/5766/2024 · 2025-10-13
Jayant Banerji, K V Aravind
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57970 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 57970 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40435-DB MFA No. 5766 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No. 5766 OF 2024 (FC) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. S. H. MEENAKSHI, W/O LATE JAGADEESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
2.
MASTER KEERTHAN J., S/O LATE JAGADEESH, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN, MOTHER BY NAME S. H. MEENAKSHI,
BOTH ARE R/AT THOTADA MANE, WARD No.31, ANJINEYASWAMY TEMPLE ROAD SHETTIHALLI, TUMAKURU CITY PIN - 572101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MADHUSUDHAN M. N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI G. BISKURAPPA @ PUTTASWAMAIAH DEAD BY LR'S,
SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA, W/O LATE G. BISKURAPPA @
Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40435-DB MFA No. 5766 of 2024
PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS.
2.
SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/O LATE G. BISKURAPPA @ PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
3.
SMT. ROOPA B., D/O LATE G. BISKURAPPA @ PUTTASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/AT No.42, HALAGERVADERAHALLY, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA, WARD No.160, KENGERI, BANGALORE-560 058. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2023 PASSED IN OS No.4/2019 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40435-DB MFA No. 5766 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A memo for withdrawal has been filed by the advocate for the appellants Sri. M. N. Madhusudhan, stating that respondent No.1 has died and the appellants do not wish to proceed further with the case.
2. The memo is kept on record.
3. This appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE
VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35