Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57966 (KAR)

SMT CHANDRIKA v. S RAVIKUMAR

WP/26086/2022 · 2025-07-22

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27842 WP No. 26086 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26086 OF 2022 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.CHANDRIKA W/O S.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. KUM. ADVAITHA R., D/O S.RAVIKUAMR AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS 3. ADHRITH R., S/O S.RAVIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER SMT.CHANDRIKA ALL ARE R/AT DOOR NO.LIG 40 1ST STAGE, KUVEMPUNAGAR MYSURU -570 023 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISH H.V., ADVOCATE) AND: S.RAVIKUMAR S/O SURYANARAYANA SHASTRY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT 375, 15TH CROSS, 5TH A MAIN BEHIND CORPORATION SCHOOL WILSON GARDEN BENGALURU -560 030 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED) Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27842 WP No. 26086 of 2022 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.08.2022, PASSED BY THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU, IN G AND W.C. NO. 08/2022, ON THE IA NO. 03 U/S 12 OF THE GUARDIAN AND WARDS ACT, VIDE ANNEXURE-A, SO FAR AS GRANTING VISITATION RIGHTS TO THE RESPONDENT HEREIN IS CONCERNED AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE VISITATION RIGHTS GRANTED TO THE RESPONDENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition is filed questioning the order of visitation passed by the family court, now the matter is posted for Judgment on 26.07.2025. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. Further it is submitted that as the matter is posted for judgment in family court, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending I.As., in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 232