Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:CGHC:53388
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 430 of 2013 Shivkumar S/o Sagarmal Agrawal Aged About 58 Years R/o Sakti, Ward No. 4, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s) versus 1 - Sitaram S/o Indarmal Agrawal Aged About 57 Years 2 - Shyam Sunder S/o Indarmal Agrawal Aged About 55 Years 3 - Bihari Lal S/o Indarmal Agrawal Aged About 53 Years All R/o Sakti, Ward No. 4, Tah. Sakti, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 4 - Mamta Devi D/o Indarmal Agrawal Aged About 41 Years W/o Sajan Kumar, R/o Dhurkot, Tah. Dabhra, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent (s) (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellant : Ms Swati Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents : None appears ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 31.10.2025
1. On perusal of order-sheets, it transpires that on 08.03.2022, it was informed to this Court that the sole appellant has died. However, no application for substitution of Legal Representatives (LRs) of the appellant has been filed by the learned counsel for appellant. On 22.08.2025 also, time was granted to learned counsel for the appellant but till date, no application for substitution of LRs of the deceased appellant has been filed. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.10.31 17:06:12 +0530
Sa 430 of 2013 2
2. In view of above, since the sole appellant has died, and sufficient time has been granted to learned counsel for the appellant to move suitable application for substitution of LRs, but till date, no application has been filed. Therefore, the present appeal has become abated. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma