Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5796 (GAU)

CHANDAN BASFOR v. THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/364/2022 · 2025-03-18

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010008252022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/364/2022 CHANDAN BASFOR S/O LATE BHOLARAM BASFOR, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 33, ARIKATI BASTI,PO UZAN BAZAR, PS LATASIL, KAMRUP (M) ASSAM GUWAHATI 781001 VERSUS THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 3 ORS UZAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI 781001, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER. 2:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 3:THE CHIEF AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 4:THE COMMISSIONER GOVT. OF ASSAM HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Y S MANNAN, MS N DEKARAJA,MR M GARODIA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. S BORA, SC, GMC Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 19.03.2025 Heard Mr. YS Mannan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Bora, learned Standing Counsel, GMC for all the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the pension and other retirement benefits as prayed for by the petitioner in the writ petition has already been granted during the pendency of the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits on instructions that the petitioner does not wish to this writ petition any further. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as not pressed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant