Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5794 (UTT)

M/S PACKWELL OVERSEAS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

WPMS/1196/2025 · 2025-04-28

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/32 WPMS No.1196 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Dr. Avinash Poddar (through video conferencing) and Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the respondent. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appeal. He further seeks directions that the appellate authority may be directed to provide all the materials, which was sought by the petitioner during the assessment proceedings. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. This Court has no doubt that, if such an application for documents is made, the appellate authority shall consider it, in accordance with law. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.04.2025 Sanjay