IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 246-1 CRM-A-1099-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Amar Autotech Private Limited ... Appellant(s) VERSUS Neha Juneja and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Ms. Bhavi Kapur, Advocate for the Appellant(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present application has been preferred seeking grant of leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 26.02.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana, in a case stemming from complaint dated 11.08.2015 filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. The complaint (supra) was filed on the ground of dishonour of cheque of Rs.12,26,605/-. After assessing all the material available on the record, the learned trial Court acquitted the respondent(s) vide judgment dated 26.02.2024. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) fairly submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in M/s. Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, the applicant would have a remedy before the Court of Sessions. 4. In view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.24 10:39 I am the author of this document 2 246-1 CRM-A-1099-2024 (O&M) Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded to the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhaina with a direction to treat the same as an appeal filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and entrust the same to appropriate Court for its disposal on merits. 5. The Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and the record of the case to the learned Sessions Judge, Ludhiana forthwith. 6. Disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 22.09.2025 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2025.09.24 10:39 I am the author of this document