Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5793 (GAU)

DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/261/2025 · 2025-06-04

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007922025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/261/2025 DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK S/O- SURESH KUMAR, R/O- VILLAGE RAJA BAZAR, JAIPUR, JAIPUR PART-I, P.O. AND P.S.- JAIPUR, DISTRICT- CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GRIHA MANTRALAYA, NEW DELHI. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL THE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE LODHI ROAD 13 CGO COMPLEX NEW DELHI-110003. 3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL THE CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE PERS BLOCK NO. 13 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110003. 4:THE COMMANDANT CISF UNIT IGI AIRPORT NEW DELHI P.O.- PALAM AIRPORT Page No.# 2/3 NEW DELHI-110037. 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001. 6:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM PIN- 788001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JUNM LASKAR, MS. J GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S S ROY (C.G.C),GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 05.06.2025 Mr. J. U. N. M. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition the respondents have disposed of the statutory appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of termination of his service. Therefore, he be granted leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh assailing the order of termination from service as well as the order passed by the appellate authority dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioner. Mr. S. S. Roy, learned Central Govt. Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 does not have any objection if the prayer is allowed. Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam is also present for the Page No.# 3/3 respondent Nos.5 and 6 and does not have any objection to the prayer of the petitioner’s counsel. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant