Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57929 (KAR)

SRI B N SUBRAYA v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/32125/2025 · 2025-11-04

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44560 WP No. 32125 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 32125 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI B N SUBRAYA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE. NANJEGOWDA, R/AT BYRAMUDI ESTATE, HIRIMANDE VILLAGE, HANBAL HOBLI, SAKALESHPURA, HASSAN 573134. (SR. CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. ABHINAV RAMANAND., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CHIEF MANAGER, CANARA BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, SAKALESHPURA BRANCH, HASSAN - 573134. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44560 WP No. 32125 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.08.2025 PASSED BY THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL -II, BENGALURU PASSED IN S.A. 126/2024 AT ANNEXURE–L CONSEQUENTLY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS CULMINATING IN THE SALE NOTICE DTD 19.06.2024, BEARING NO.CB0694/REC/SARFA/ESC/SALE/52686585/ 2023-24 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK AT ANNEXURE 'F'. IN THE VIEW OF THE BAR CONTAINED IN SECTION 31(1) OF THE SECULARIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA AGRICULTURAL CREDIT OPERATIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1974 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44560 WP No. 32125 of 2025 ORAL ORDER When the matter came up on 03.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, matter was directed to be listed for ‘dismissal’ on 04.11.2025. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS,List No.: 5 Sl No.: 3