Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57928 (DEL)

M/S ZENTIC PHARMACEUTICAL v. APSARA HERBALS

CS(COMM)/1111/2025 · 2025-12-17

Tejas Karia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 1111/2025 p. 1 $~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1111/2025, I.A. 25925/2025, I.A. 25935/2025, I.A. 25936/2025, I.A. 25937/2025, I.A. 25938/2025 & I.A. 29648/2025 M/S ZENTIC PHARMACEUTICAL .....Plaintiff Through: Dr. Amit George, Mr. Faisal Mohammed and Ms. Rupam Jha, Advocates. versus APSARA HERBALS .....Defendant Through: Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Panchal, Mr. Deepank Singhal and Mr. Ritik Raghuvanshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 17.12.2025 I.A. 31385/2025 & CS(COMM) 1111/2025 1. This is an Application under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for withdrawing the present Suit. 2. Accordingly, the Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending Applications are disposed of except CRL.M.A. 35229/2025 under Section 379 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), which shall remain pending despite the dismissal of the Suit as having been withdrawn. CRL.M.A. 35229/2025 3. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Defendant under Section 379 of the BNSS. 4. The learned Senior Counsel for the Defendant submits that in Paragraph No. 22 (b) of this Application, a relief is sought against Ms. Renu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:18:48 CS(COMM) 1111/2025 p. 2 Kumari, who is the constituted attorney of the Plaintiff in this Suit, and Mr. Anjuman Sharma, who is the proprietor of the Plaintiff and the authorized representative of M/s Afsara Herbal Products Private Limited. 5. As Mr. Anjuman Sharma is the proprietor of the Plaintiff, the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff has instructions to appear for Mr. Anjuman Sharma. Accordingly, let Notice be issued to Ms. Renu Kumari at the address, which shall be provided by the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff within a period of three days, through all permissible modes upon filing of the Process Fees, returnable on 13.04.2026. 6. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff requests for additional time to file the Reply to this Application. 7. Accordingly, let the Reply by the Plaintiff to this Application be filed within a period of four weeks from date. In addition to the Reply to be filed by the Plaintiff, let the Reply by Mr. Anjuman Sharma to this Application also be filed within a period of four weeks from date. Let the Reply by Ms. Renu Kumari be filed within a period of four weeks from the date of service of Notice. Rejoinder(s) thereto, if any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter. 8. List on 13.04.2026. TEJAS KARIA, J DECEMBER 17, 2025 ap This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2025 at 13:18:48