Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 57927 (CHH)

RAMDULARE BASORE @ PINTU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/8023/2025 · 2025-10-30

Smt Rajani Dubey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:53348 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No.8023 of 2025 1 - Ramdulare Basore @ Pintu S/o Shri Kirat Basore Aged About 28 Years R/o Bargava P.S. - Bargava, Tahsil - Devsar Post – Dala Bargava Distt - Singrauli (M.P.) Applicant (s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Chandani, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) For Applicant (s) : Mr. Dhaneshwar Yadav, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sunita Sahu, PL Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 31/10/2025 1. The accused/applicant has moved this First Bail Application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.51/2018, registered at Police Station Chandani, District Digitally signed by R NIRALA 2 Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 457 & 380/34 of IPC. 2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the applicant and other co- accused persons committed theft of gold and silver ornaments from the house of the complainant amounting to Rs.4,65,000/-. Based on this, offence has been registered against the applicant and other co-accused persons. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that the co-accused Ramjanam Basour has been granted regular bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.08.2019 in MCRC No.3362/2019 and the co- accused Ramsagar Basore has been granted bail vide order dated 01.03.2021 in MCRC No.8705/2020 and the co-accused Govind Basour, Ramkumar Basour, Sipahi Lal and Bahadur Basour have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 07.11.2019 in MCRC Nos.5969/2019 & 6103 of 2019. The applicant is in jail since 20.03.2025 and trial may take some time in its conclusion. Therefore, the applicant may kindly be released on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application of the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case-diary. 3 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and further considering the fact that the co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by the Coordinate Bench and this Court, applicant is in jail since 20.03.2025 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Applicant/accused is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. He shall appear before the Trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Nirala